RG Lead Generation and Conversion 101

Probably the biggest development in Australian Regular Giving in the 2010s and certainly has been lead generation and conversion.  In fact I’m happy to blame a lot of the absence of blog posts on the effort I’ve expended on getting this to work for my organisation. (I may be happy to do that, but it’s probably not correct).  Generating warm lists of potential donors, calling them and converting them into regular donors hardly reinventing of the wheel, but the growth of lead generation sources over the last couple of years has turned it into a viable recruitment model, not just in terms of ROI, but  also in terms of volume.  Given that here are some of the basics I’ve learned about LGAC (does anyone have a snappy name for this yet?).

Lead Generation

What sources are there?

Lots.. from pre-transactional grids, to bespoke survey questions, through petition sites, onto giveaways and post transactional surveys.  There’s a lot out there.

Which source is best?

This is the most obvious question, but also the wrong one.  All sources will work to a greater or lesser extent.  The important thing is to work out the cost of acquisition including conversion.  The only real way to find out is this is to trial it.

How much should a lead cost?

About the length of a piece of string. Some are incredibly cheap, less than an Australian dollar.  Some can be over $10.

Are all leads created equal?

No, of course not  As different leads are produced in  different ways, the have different levels of engagement. If someone has opted into calling you because they started filling out a survey because they wanted to win a car, half way through that survey they are given 5 different charities to opt into and you’re one of the three they tick, they won’t have made the same amount of investment in opting in as someone who’s seen a petition related to the cause your organisation works, signed it then seen an opportunity to opt in to hear from you. That level of emotional investment during the lead recruitment will be a big part of how the lead performs later on.

How much incorrect data should I expect?

Again it depends on the lead source. If it’s expensive data then you should expect them to have systems of checks and balances that clean the data before you see it.  If it’s cheap as chips then don’t be surprised if you call centre is going to report a high number of wrong numbers or people named Seymour Butts.

Lead Conversion

How soon should the lead be called?

I’m yet to find too short a time.  It’s pretty much accepted that the leads decay incredibly quickly.

What is decay?

Decay is the idea that the longer the amount of time from when the donor opting in to be being called until you actually getting on the phone, the less likely they are to become a donor.

Why do leads decay?

Many reasons, firstly when they opted in to be contacted they were at a peak on interest in being contacted, although it’s not a guarantee that they’ll be less interested when you ring, you will be further removed from that moment and it will be harder for them to recall that they really wanted to hear from you. Also unless the lead is exclusive to you then they will have had calls from other telemarketers even from other charities.  They’ll be less likely to pick up the phone if you’re their 50th call from a number you don’t know and they’ll be less likely to convert if they’ve signed up to another charity or decided to have solar panels fitted in the last week.

Do leads decay at different rates?

Absolutely.  They are effected by many things.  The level of engagement people had when opting in.  The number of other things that they opted in to hear about at the same time as you and a host of other things.  The best way to establish how the lead will perform is really to try them out.

How do these donors stay on board?

A very good question, there isn’t nearly as much data as F2F donors.  They appear to have slightly fewer donor driven cancellations early on than face to face but slightly more than conventional (whatever that means) telephone recruitment.

What’s the deal with capacity?

It’s important to balance the number of leads you have coming in with the amount of leads your suppliers can call quickly. This is one of the hardest things to manage day to day.  If your phone provider is flooded with more leads than they can call the leads will decay.  However at the same time you don’t want them to bring in more callers than they have work for. The only most effective way of manage it is to spread the load across a few sources and providers.  This also has the benefit of meaning you can see if different providers perform better with certain lead sources.

What are the figures I should be looking at in a providers performance?

Well I haven’t seen any proper bench marking so it’s a bit hard to judge.  I always believe in judging the provider against their own targets.  As long as the supplier’s targets provide a good cost per donor then go with them.  Look at the penetration and conversion rate the supplier expects, calculate that against the costs of buying the data and doing the calling and you’ll find your expected cost per donor.  Roughly speaking should probably be a bit cheaper than face to face.

Getting Advocacy and Fundraising Propositions To Play Nice

For some organisations, training phone or F2F teams on a proposition is comparatively easy. They have a simple idea which will work pretty much forever; give us $25 p/m and we’ll save someone’s sight each month or $30 month buys rations  for a family in an disaster area. Campaigning organisations however are often working on things that have a time defined outcome. Maybe they are campaigning to free a prisoner of conscience or stop a liquefied natural gas hub being built on one of the most beautiful parts of the world.  There are a number of potential benefits with mixing advocacy and dialogue fundrasing, increased media exposure and public knowledge, greater urgency in the ask, but there are just as many potential pitfalls.

So how do you choose what to get them to talk about?  Here are 5 simple rules to help you decide on what you should guide your dialogue fundraisers to.

Do People Care

The first thing to think about is how good the story is. There needs to be something in danger, it needs to be a thing that a lot of people will care about (no one would give to a campaign to save the plastic tags on loaves of bread) and the donor needs to be the hero of the story.

Simplicity

Fundraisers will need to explain the issue in simple terms and very quickly. I care passionately about the role new economics plays in creating a better future, but I can’t explain sufficiently to get people to care about it in less than half an hour. Ideally you want a story that can be told in 30 second.

Consistency

It’s common for advocacy campaigns have a lot of two-ing and froing, highs, lows, victories and setbacks all the way throughout their life cycles. Sadly for fundraising purposes this is a pain in the bum.  If a campaign is going to be evolving every month, the fundraisers will have to write a new script every month.  This makes it harder for them to hone it down and easier to loose track of what they’re supposed to be saying.

Time

A paradox exists that when campaigns come closer to their point of victory or defeat (hopefully victory) the greater the urgency proposition and the more successful it will be in winning people over. However, once the victory has been won, donor can loose a little of their anchor to the organisation.  If you’re looking for a long term gift then this presents a problem.  On top of this, you’ll have to largely tear up the script that your fundraisers have been using, which will frustrate the hell out of them and can hurt results.

Similarity to Other Work

If the topic you pick is similar to other projects your organisation works on then it should be easier to transition the dialogue teams and the donors to the new topic. Pick something that has transferable themes and aligns strongly with your core values.

Do The Fundraisers Care?

Perhaps above all else you need to make sure that the fundraisers care about what they’re talking about.  All dialogue fundraising works because the fundraiser is using their enthusiasm to build enthusiasm in the potential donor.  Your organisation may see one campaign as a priority, you may think that its something that resonates with donors, but if the people actually doing the asking don’t care, your fundraising campaign will be dead in the water.

Getting fundraising and advocacy to be nice to each other is possible and it can be very successful, but remember that the fundraisers priority needs to be raising the funds.